Cookie Warning


A Warning from Poirot:

Mon Ami, allow me to warn you of a possible danger of reading this blog. Although I'm not a programmer, I understand that cookies may be used on this blog. So if your computer, tablet, phone (etc.) finds cookies objectionable, please peruse these posts with a cookie-friendly internet-surfing device.
Showing posts with label stabbing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label stabbing. Show all posts

Thursday, March 24, 2016

One Mysterious Knife?

Finally, the knife ends up in police custody!

In her novel The Murder on the Links, Agatha Christie describes the murder weapon as having a plain black handle. In the Agatha Christie's Poirot adaptation, it sports an elegant golden handle. In her novel, it's referred to as a knife, a letter opener, or a dagger. Jack Renauld had it made to commemorate his military service in World War I. He was a pilot, and although it's never stated, we wonder if some of the metal came from the wreckage of his crashed plane.

The knife in Agatha Christie's novel may not be as pretty as its TV cousin, but it's more mysterious. Finally, we learn the reason for its amazing mobility. Jack Renauld commissioned not just one knife, but three. He gave one to his mother, one to Ms. Duveen, and one to Marthe Daubreil. So which knife committed which murder? 

I wonder how many former soldiers like Jack Renauld commissioned weapons to commemorate their World War I service.

Dragon Dave

Wednesday, March 23, 2016

Another Stabbing?

Another stabbing victim in The Murder on the Links?

Hey! What's that knife gotten up to now? There it is: stuck in the chest of a man found in the garden shed on Paul Renault's property. So the knife has killed again! 

Or has it? The coroner's not so sure. After he assesses the body, he finds insufficient blood outside the wound. So that means someone stuck the knife into the man after he died. Why would someone hide the body? And why would someone stage another stabbing?

It's just one more question for Hercule Poirot. But that's why we love Agatha Christie: She keeps us guessing.

Dragon Dave

Thursday, November 12, 2015

Archibald Christie's Passion For Golf

By all accounts, Agatha Christie enjoyed playing golf. It was a pastime she shared with her first husband, Archibald Christie. But writing came first for Agatha Christie. So while she wrote her novels on the weekends, Archibald spent his weekends at the Sunningdale Golf Club. 

Interestingly, she chose to make a golf enthusiast the victim in The Murder on the Links, her second Hercule Poirot novel.

In her story, Captain Hastings travels back to France at Hercule Poirot's invitation. There they discover Mr. Renauld, the rich man who wrote to Poirot, pleading for the great detective's assistance, has been found stabbed on the golf course. This isn't just any golf course: this is one Mr. Renauld helped design and fund, and it lies right next to his property. Agatha Christie never explores this aspect of the story, but you can imagine the irony of the situation, as well as how his wife and son must have viewed it. This man, who to a certain extent lived for golf, has now also died for his cherished sport. Poirot and Hastings spend the entire day assisting the French police, then take a car to the Hotel Des Bains, which has been recommended to them by the examining magistrate M. Hautet. 


In the TV adaptation,
Captain Hastings plans a vacation for himself and Poirot.
Instead of the Hotel Des Bains,
he books them into the Hotel Du Golf.
The film location is the five-star Hotel Normandy,
located in the French city of Deauville

Was Agatha Christie merely envious that her husband got to play a sport he loved while she locked herself away at home to write? Even if she loved writing? Did she suspect that his time away from her, playing a sport he loved with other men and women, might lead him to form new and powerful relationships, which would sap his devotion to her?  We may not know what drove her to make a golf enthusiast like her husband the victim of her next novel. What we do know is that, a few years after she wrote The Murder on the Links, Archibald Christie asked her for a divorce. 

But then, life imitates art, often in unexpected ways.

Dragon Dave

Tuesday, October 6, 2015

Arthur Hastings, a Beautiful Lady, and the Battle of the Somme

Agatha Christie's second Hercule Poirot novel, The Murder on the Links, starts with Captain Arthur Hastings riding on a train in France. In his carriage, his sole companion is a young lady who goes against all his classic ideas of what a woman should be. She swears, says the most outrageous things, and wears too much makeup. Yet, despite all this, he finds himself strangely attracted to her. 

As they talk, Hastings opens up to her, and tells her that the landscape they are traveling through reminds him of his experiences during World War I. Like many of his friends, he fought in the great war, and saw many people of his generation die. The scenery especially reminds him of the Battle of the Somme, which was waged between July and November 1916. After receiving serious injuries, he was invalided out of France. He was sent to a manor house that had been converted into an Army hospital, where he recovered from his wounds. Thereafter, he never returned to active service on the battlefield. Instead, during the remainder of WWI, he served the British Army in lesser capacities. 

The Battle of the Somme was one of the bloodiest battles of World War I. In all, roughly one million people were killed or wounded. Hastings, who recovered fully from his injuries, is one of the lucky ones. Despite his breezy, unaffected manner, it's easy to understand how deeply such an experience would scar him for life.

Recently, Hastings has been working for a British M.P. (or Member of Parliament), and on this occasion his duties took him to France. But he doesn't seem heavily involved in his government work. Aside from the occasional trip abroad,he may sit idle for days or weeks. So as he travels with the girl toward Calais, he tells her about his friend Hercule Poirot, the famous detective, and how he sometimes helps him investigate his cases. In particular, he references the poisoning of Mrs. Emily Ingelthorp at Styles Court, which Agatha Christie covered in the first Hercule Poirot novel, The Mysterious Affair at Styles. When the train reaches the station, Hastings reluctantly disembarks and parts company with her. 



As the train steams off to its next destination, this beautiful young woman seems to walk out of his life. Although he looks for her, he doesn't see her when he boards the ferry that will take him across the English Channel.

As I mentioned previously in my post, The Mysterious Battle of Ypres, in the TV version of The Mysterious Affair at Styles, we found Captain Arthur Hastings recovering from his injuries in a converted English manor house. Unlike today, he has no continuously broadcasting TV channels such as the BBC or CNN to watch. Nor can he read reports posted on a continuously throughout the day on his laptop or cell phone. The only source of news he gets comes via newspapers and newsreels. When we first see him, he sits in a darkened room, and the film projector shows him footage from the recent Third Battle of Ypres. This battle, also known as the Battle of Passchendaele, was waged in Belgium, and the resultant destruction spurred a mass exodus of refugees to other countries. Shortly after that, at the invitation of his friend John Cavendish, he visits Styles Court. There, he meets up with Hercule Poirot, one of many Belgians who has fled the fighting to resettle, at least temporarily, in England.

The Third Battle of Ypres occurred between July and November of 1917, a year after the Battle of the Somme. I wonder why the TV adaptation of The Mysterious Affair at Styles was set later than Agatha Christie wrote the novel, in 1917. Why would the production team ignore Captain Hastings conversation with this young lady on the train in The Murder on the Links, which clearly dates the Styles affair in 1916? I understand why the people behind the series chose to set all the Poirot stories between WWI and WWII, as opposed to letting the later novels appear as Agatha Christie wrote them, such as the 1960s and 1970s. Still, given that decision, it seems odd to set productions of Agatha Christie's first two Poirot novels later than she did. 

Anyone else find this as strange as I do?

Related Poirot And Friends Posts
The Mysterious Battle of Ypres